NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Billbergia Developments Pty Ltd v The Minister for Planning [2010] NSWLEC 1025
APPLICANT Billbergia Developments Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT The Minister for Planning
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10667 of 2009
CORAM: Brown C
KEY ISSUES: CONSENT ORDERS :- modification of condition requiring no Occupation Certificates to be issued prior to remediation of adjoining site
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s75W(4)
DATES OF HEARING: 15, 16, 18 December 2009, 27,28, 29 January 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 29 January 2010
APPLICANT Mr P Tomasetti SC SOLICITORS Maddocks Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms S Duggan, barrister SOLICITORS Department of Planning
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C
29 January 2010
10667 of 2009 Billbergia Developments Pty Ltd v The Minister for Planning
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: On 13 November 2007 The Minister for Planning approved Major Project No. 05_0110 under Part 3A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EPA Act) on land known as Site 1A, Precinct B, 40 Walker Street, Rhodes (the site). The development comprised four buildings containing 256 residential dwellings, basement car parking over two levels containing a total of 319 spaces, associated landscaping works and shared facilities and strata subdivision. 2 On 27 July 2009, the applicant lodged an application to modify Major Project No. 05_0110 with the Department of Planning. Section 75W(4) provides that The Minister may modify the approval (with or without conditions) or disapprove of the modification. On 9 September 2009, the Department of Planning issued Director Generals Requirements for the modification application. The deemed refusal period of 40 days that applies under s 75W(5) ended on 16 September 2009. The appeal was filed on 17 September 2009. 3 Section 75W(5) provides a right of appeal to the Court for the proponent of a project who is dissatisfied with the determination of a request under this section or with the failure of the Minister to determine the request within 40 days after it is made. 4 The modification seeks to modify condition F1 of the approval. Condition F1 states: F1 Issuing of Occupation Certificates No Occupation Certificate (including interim certificates) shall be issued prior to the completion of remediation activities in Precinct B. In this regard, a Site Audit Statement is to be prepared in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 and completed by a site auditor accredited by the Environmental Protection Agency. The site auditor statement shall be provided to the PCA verifying that the whole of the 40 Walker Street (also known as Precinct B) is fully remediated in accordance with the development consent DA437-12-2002. 5 The modification seeks to replace condition F1 with the following: F1 Issuing of Occupation Certificates An Occupation Certificate may be issued for Site 1A (Lot 102 in DP 1101827) prior to the completion of remediation activities in Precinct B only given the provision of the following to the Principle Certifying Authority: A Site Audit Statement prepared in accordance with the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 for Stage 1 and 2 of remediation (including Site 1A) and completed by a site auditor accredited by the Environmental Protection Authority. The Site Audit Statement referred to shall be provided to the PCA verifying that the whole of Stage 1 and 2 (Lots 98, 99, 101, 102 and 103 in DP 1101827 and Lots 202, 203 and 204 in DP 1101828) of remediation is fully remediated in accordance with the development consent DA 437-12-2002. A detailed Environmental Management Plan for the subject site is to be adopted based on the Interim Environmental Management Action Plans and implemented whilst remediation activities are being undertaken on the remainder of the Precinct B site. The Environmental Management Plan is to be made in accordance with the recommendations and measures provided in the Report on Human Health Risk Assessment prepared by Douglas Partners Pty Ltd dated May 2009. 6 Put simply, the original condition F1 provided that an Occupation Certificate for any of the units within the proposed development could not be issued until the remediation activities in the adjoining site, Precinct B, were completed. The modification application seeks to amend this condition by deleting the original condition F1 and replacing it with a modified condition F1 that provides for an Occupation Certificate to be issued prior to the completion of the remediation activities but subject to the specific requirements in the modified condition. 7 Precinct B is also known as the Lednez site and the Minister for Infrastructure and Planning granted development consent for the remediation in May 2004. As explained to the Court, the remediation of the Lednez site has taken longer than anticipated and consequently the 256 units on the site has been largely completed prior to the full remediation of the Lednez site. The consequence being that Occupation Certificates cannot be issued for the units.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate