NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 174 LGERA 178
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 63
APPLICANT PARTIES : Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10310 of 2009
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: COSTS :- whether fair and reasonable to award costs to applicant in Class 1 appeal challenging a condition imposing a s 94 contribution
City of Sydney Development Contributions Plan 2006 LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 3.7
Aldi Foods v Holroyd City Council (2005) 142 LGERA 141 Berk v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) (1993) 78 LGERA 180 Maygood v City of Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1112 CASES CITED: Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v South Sydney City Council, NSWLEC, Brown C, 12 September 2001 (unreported) Quota Corporation v Leichhardt Municipal Council [1981] 45 LGERA 319 Rose Consulting Group v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2003) 58 NSWLR 159 Sansom v Port Stephens Council (2007) 156 LGERA 125 Segal v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177
DATES OF HEARING: 23 March 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 April 2010
APPLICANT Mr D Russell QC with Mr M Seymour SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Meriton Group RESPONDENT Mr P McEwen SC with Ms L Byrne SOLICITOR City of Sydney
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate