NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tenacity Investments v Ku-Ring-Gai Council and Ors [2008] NSWLEC 27
APPLICANT: Tenacity Investments
FIRST RESPONDENT: Ku-ring-gai Council
SECOND RESPONDENTS: Russell and Angela Cooke
THIRD RESPONDENTS: Vicki and Daniel Ming
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Peter Dobrijevic
FIFTH RESPONDENT: Yvonne Forsyth
PARTIES : SIXTH RESPONDENTS: Ivan and Janet Lum
SEVENTH RESPONDENTS: John and Virginia Hill
EIGHTH RESPONDENTS: Christopher and Aini Wong
NINTH RESPONDENTS: Patrick Lee and Liza Lam
TENTH RESPONDENT: Marina Brun-Smits
ELEVENTH RESPONDENTS: Gavin and Lynn Hucker
TWELFTH RESPONDENTS: Steven and Gum You; Kwok and Sylvia Ng
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30688 of 2006
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Easements :- imposition of drainage easement by Court under s 40 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - whether easement reasonably necessary for development to have effect in accordance with development consent which Court has determined to grant - whether owner of burdened land can be adequately compensated for any loss or other disadvantage that would arise from imposition of the easement - whether all reasonable attempts made by applicant to obtain the easement or an easement having same effect without success - whether Court should exercise its discretion to impose easement - appropriate compensation.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate