NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : BARBARA FILIPOWSKI v. GERARD ETHELL [1998] NSWLEC 25 PARTIES : BARBARA FILIPOWSKI v. GERARD ETHELL FILE NUMBER(S) : 50015, 50016 & 50017 of 1998 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: :- Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 43 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 10, r 1 Marine Pollution Act 1987 ss 27(1), 28(1) Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 sch 4, 4.14(5) R v O'Neill (1979) 2 NSWLR 582 at 588; R v Chin (1984) 157 CLR 671 at 676; R v Altham (1992) 62 A Crim R 126 at 127; Vella v The Queen (1990) 2 WAR 537; Gouldham v R (1970) WAR 119; CASES CITED: Hornsby Shire Council v Winsloe (Bignold J, 20 August 1998, unreported at paras 18-30; Environment Protection Authority v Genkem Pty Ltd (1992) 79 LGERA 47; see Genkem Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1994) 85 LGERA 197; Ex parte Lovell; Re Buckley and Anor (1938) 38 SR 153; Johnson v Miller (1937) 59 CLR 467 ; Broome v Chenoweth (1946) 73 CLR 583 DATES OF HEARING: 10 September 1998 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/27/1998
Mr A L Hill, Barrister LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr B W Larkin, Barrister
JUDGMENT: 22
Introduction
1. Three prosecutions have been brought under the Marine Pollution Act 1987 arising out of an incident where a substance known as nonyl phenol escaped into the waters of Port Botany during a discharge of cargo from a vessel to the terminal. The defendants, Terminals Pty Ltd (Terminals) and Mr G Ethell have respectively pleaded guilty to the charges against them.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate