NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rowsell -v- Ware [2007] NSWLEC 796 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Rowsell, Kylie & Michael PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ware, Timothy & Belinda
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20919 of 2007
CORAM: Murrell C - Fakes AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- Application to remove tree
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Barker & Kyriakides [2007] NSW LEC 292
DATES OF HEARING: 23/11/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27 November 2007
APPLICANT Roswell, Kylie & Michael LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ware, Timothy & Belinda
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C and Fakes AC
27 November 2007
20919 of 2007 Kylie and Michael Rowsell -v- Timothy and Belinda Ware
JUDGMENT 1 The proceedings today are for an application made under section 6 of the Trees (Disputes between Neighbours) Act 2006. The subject tree is an Ironbark Eucalyptus.
2 The applicant, Mr and Mrs Rowsell, is seeking the removal of the subject tree located at the rear of the their property and on the adjoining land to the rear at No 88 Angle Road, Leumeah. The applicant provided a survey that shows 0.500 of the tree trunk on the property at the rear on the respondent's land and 0.300 on the applicant's land. As such the tree is jointly owned between the neighbours.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate