NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Guo v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 544
APPLICANT William Guo PARTIES : RESPONDENT Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10213 of 2007
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Expansion of brothel, suitability of site, impact on neighbours, weight to be given to LEP Amendment on separation distances.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001
CASES CITED: Terrace Tower Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 289; Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614
DATES OF HEARING: 16/08/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 August 2007
APPLICANT Mr R. Creighton (Agent) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Marincowitz, solicitor of Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
30 August 2007
10213 of 2007 William Guo v Parramatta City Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 This appeal was lodged against Councils refusal of a development application for the expansion of an existing brothel at 110 – 112 Ballandella Road, Pendle Hill. The brothel operates on the basis of consent orders granted by the Court on 9 January 2006, which imposed a set of conditions for the use of the property. Apparently the subsequent operations of the brothel have not been in compliance with the conditions of consent and proceedings were undertaken in respect of the contraventions.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate