NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hooper v Port Stephens Council and Anor [2010] NSWLEC 107
APPLICANT Stephen Hooper PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Port Stephens Council SECOND RESPONDENT Trevlyn Peter Hallett
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40010 of 2010
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- judicial review proceedings - whether amended points of claim raise grounds relevant to judicial review or are impermissible merit grounds
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Local Government Act 1993 LEGISLATION CITED: Port Stephens Development Control Plan 2007 Port Stephens Local Environmental Plan 2000 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards
CASES CITED: F & D Bonnacorso v City of Canada Bay Council and Others (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 537; (2008) 158 LGERA 250
DATES OF HEARING: 24 June 2010 25 June 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2010
APPLICANT In person FIRST RESPONDENT Mr M Fraser LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITOR Harris Wheeler Lawyers SECOND RESONDENT Mr P Larkin SOLICITOR Halletts Solicitors
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate