NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council [2007] NSWLEC 648
APPLICANT Aristomenis Pikoulas PARTIES : RESPONDENT Canterbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10619 of 2007
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Alterations and Additions to existing shop and dwelling, second dwelling house, dual occupancy - prohibition, car parking.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 138-Canterbury Precinct Canterbury Development Control Plan 20 - Car Parking Code
DATES OF HEARING: 13/09/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 13 September 2007
APPLICANT Mr A. Pikoulas, litigant in person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms P. Hudson, solicitor of Marsdens Law Group
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
13 September 2007
10619 of 2007 Aristomenis Pikoulas v Canterbury City Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT 1 Existing at No. 17 Crinan Street, Hurlstone Park, are two separated buildings. The two-storey building fronting Crinan Street contains a ground floor shop with an associated dwelling extending over both levels. The detached rear out-building facing Marcia Lane, accommodates a ground floor garage with two levels above, one being a mezzanine floor. These two upper levels were constructed essentially in accordance with a Development Consent No. R8256/96, which was granted by the council on 30 May 1996.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate