NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 167 LGERA 205
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hastings Co-operative Ltd v Port Macquarie Hastings Council [2009] NSWLEC 99
Hastings Co-operative Ltd ABN 86 601 035 121 (Applicant) PARTIES : Port Macquarie Hastings Council (First Respondent) Emanlach Pty Ltd ACN 071 417 439 (Second Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41266 of 2008
CORAM: Lloyd J
JUDICIAL REVIEW :- development consent - characterisation of proposed supermarket under Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2001 - proposed supermarket a "general store" not a "shop" - whether "general store" is nevertheless a species of "shop" in the relevant zone and therefore prohibited
KEY ISSUES: JURISDICTION :- validity of notice of development consent - notice invalid as it did not adequately describe the land - valid notice under s 101 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 would not apply to council classification of a development as permissible or prohibited - incorrect classification as prohibited would be beyond power - Hickman principle
WORDS AND PHRASES :- "general store" - "shop" - Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2001
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 101 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 cl 124 Hastings Local Environmental Plan 2001 cl 4(f), cl 6(1), cl 9 & Sch 2
Chambers v Maclean Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 100; (2003) 57 NSWLR 152 Cranbrook School v Woollahra Municipal Council [2006] NSWCA 155; (2006) 66 NSWLR 379 De Haas v Williams [2004] NSWLEC 15, (2004) 132 LGERA 195 Kelly v The Queen [2004] HCA 12; (2004) 218 CLR 216 Kindimindi Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Cove Council [2006] NSWCA 23; (2006) 143 LGERA 277 Lesnewski v Mosman Municipal Council [2005] NSWCA 99; (2005) 138 LGERA 207 Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd [2005] NSWCA 455; (2005) 64 NSWLR 695; (2005) 147 LGERA 234 Maryland Development Co Pty Ltd v Penrith City Council [2001] NSWLEC 135; (2001) 115 LGERA 75; CASES CITED: Matic v Mid- Western Regional Council [2008] NSWLEC 113 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 R v Metal Trades Employers' Association; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union, Australian Section (1951) 82 CLR 208 Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1963) 110 CLR 529 Snowside Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2003] NSWLEC 136; (2003) 126 LGERA 279 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2; (2003) 211 CLR 476 Snowside Pty Ltd v Holroyd City Council [2003] NSWLEC 136; (2003) 126 LGERA 279 Woolworths Ltd v Pallas Newco Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 422; (2004) 61 NSWLR 707; (2004) 136 LGERA 288
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate