NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ristevski v Sutherland Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 441
APPLICANT Pida and Elizabeth Ristevski PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10251 of 2007
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Attached Dual Occupancy, streetscape impact, drainage, privacy
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2000 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 12/07/07
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12 July 2007
APPLICANT Mr P. Vergotis, solicitor of Cutler Hughes & Harris LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr A. Markham, solicitor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
12 July 2007
10251 of 2007 Pida and Elizabeth Ristevski v Sutherland Shire Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT Background. 1 This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a development application for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of an attached dual occupancy at 232 Gymea Bay Road, Gymea Bay.
2 For the appeal number of issues were raised, which may be summarised as follows: o Adequacy of detailed information, o Drainage; as the land falls are away from the street, no downstream easements are proposed, o Landscaping, o Matters raised by objectors, including the facade design, streetscape impacts and overlooking opportunities.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate