NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Great Lakes Council v Big Island Forster Pty Limited & Ors [2007] NSWLEC 270
APPLICANT Great Lakes Council FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Big Island Forster Pty Limited SECOND RESPONDENT Nino Lani THIRD RESPONDENT Lampo Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40234 of 2007
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Civil Enforcement :- whether development consent required for grazing Continuing Use Rights : -whether continuing use rights exist for grazing - whether use abandoned
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s109 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Act 1997 Schedule 1 Great Lakes Local Environmental Plan 1996
Bonus Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1954) 19 LGR (NSW) 375; Council of City of Parramatta v Brickworks Limited (1971-1973) 128 CLR 1; Hudak v Waverley Municipal Council (1989) 18 NSWLR 709; Lane Cove Municipal Council v Lujeta Pty Ltd (1986) 58 LGRA 157; CASES CITED: Minister for Planning v Rose Bay Marina Pty Ltd (2003) 126 LGERA 181; Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305; South Sydney City Council v Houlakis & Anor (1996) 92 LGERA 401; Sydney City Council v Ke-Su Investments Pty Ltd (No2) (1982) 51 LGRA 186; Vaughan-Taylor v David Mitchell-Melcann Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 580; Webber v Minister for Housing and Local Government [1976] 3 All ER 981
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate