NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Belmore Residents Action Group Inc v Canterbury City Council & Anor [2007] NSWLEC 38
APPLICANT: Belmore Residents Action Group Incorporated
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Canterbury City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Greek Orthodox Parish and Community of Belmore and District All Saints Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40947 of 2006
CORAM: Lloyd J
Judicial Review :- development application – educational establishment - non-compliance with floor space ratio control - whether strict compliance is unnecessary or unreasonable - obligation to take into consideration underlying object or purpose of planning control – no material error affecting ultimate decision KEY ISSUES:
LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 – Development Standards Canterbury Local Environmental Plan No. 178 – Belmore-Lakemba Precinct cll 11 and 14
Centro Properties Ltd v Hurstville City Council (2004) 135 LGERA 257 ; Guideline Drafting and Design v Marrickville Municipal Council (1988) 64 LGRA 275; Hooker Corp Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council (1986) 130 LGERA 438; CASES CITED: Memel Holdings Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2000) 110 LGERA 217; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24.; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (2000) 199 CLR 343; Parramatta City Council v Hale (1982) 47 LGRA 319; Winten Property Group Ltd v North Sydney Council (2001) 130 LGERA 79
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate