NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mavis McKinnon v. Hallbridge Pty Ltd [1998] NSWLEC 85 APPLICANT Mavis McKinnon PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hallbridge Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 30148 of 1997 CORAM: Sheahan J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 Land & Environment Court Act 1979 CASES CITED: Donald Campbell & Co Limited v Pollak [1972] AC 732.; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Limited v International Produce Merchants Pty Limited & Ors (1988) 81 ALR 397 DATES OF HEARING: 03/07/98 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/10/1998
APPLICANT Mr M Evans, Barrister Ms M Rodgers of Minter Ellison
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S Kerr, Barrister Mr S Suchard of Colin Biggers & Paisley
JUDGMENT:
The only outstanding matter to be resolved in this case is the question of costs.
The substantive issues were resolved in my judgment of 12 June 1998, the thrust of which was as follows:
* that the applicant was entitled to relief;
* that she was entitled to compensation defined to include the value of the land upon which the encroachment was made ($562);
* that within the meaning of s 4(1) of the Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 ("the EB Act"), the "multiplier" should not be applied in the circumstances of the case, because there was no evidence upon which the Court could conclude that the encroachment was intentional, or the result of negligence, on the part of the respondent;
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate