NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : ACM Landmark Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council [2007] NSWLEC 429
APPLICANT ACM Landmark Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Cessnock City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10163 of 2007
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Multiple Unit Housing, compatibility with controls, access, impact on neighbours solar access, traffic
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Cessnock Local Environmental Plan 1989
DATES OF HEARING: 12/06/2007, 28/06/2007 and 09/07/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18 July 2007
APPLICANT Mr S. Williams, solicitor of Thompson Norrie Solicitors LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr R. Mallik, solicitor of Mallik Rees Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
18 July 2007
10163 of 2007 ACM Landmark Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 This appeal was lodged against Councils' deemed refusal of a development application for a 23 unit multiple dwelling development at No's 82A & 88 Alexandra Street, Kurri Kurri.
2 For the appeal a number of issues were identified which can be summarised as follows: o the proposal does not satisfy character objectives for the area; o the proposal does not provide high quality urban design and residential amenity; o impacts on neighbours; o boundary fencing; o drainage; o traffic and access; o public interest in terms of objections from neighbours.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate