NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Inwood v Marrickville Council [2008] NSWLEC 1338
APPLICANT Brad Inwood PARTIES : RESPONDENT Marrickville Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10541 of 2008
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Appeal against conditions of development consent for alterations and additions to a semi detached dwelling - consent orders
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 11/07/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11 July 2008
APPLICANT Ms P Burns, solicitor of Maddocks Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr G Christmas, solicitor of Marrickville Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
11 July 2008
10541 of 2008 Brad Inwood v Marrickville Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal against conditions imposed by Marrickville Council (council) on the consent for an application for alterations and additions to an existing semi detached house at 40 Croydon Street, Petersham (the site). The parties are seeking consent orders from the Court. 2 The conditions include a deferred commencement condition which requires the removal of the ensuite bathroom which was to be located within the access way at the side of the house. Council's principal concern related to the visibility of the ensuite from the street and also the lack of symmetry that would result between the two semi-detached houses. 3 Discussions with the applicant and the council have taken place which has resulted in an agreement to place a camellia to screen the ensuite from the street. There is also a camellia in a similar location on the adjoining semi. 4 The applicant has also agreed to an additional condition which will require that the front of the ensuite be brick to match the brick of the existing dwelling. 5 On this basis I am satisfied that the issues between the parties have been resolved and that the consent orders sought by the parties may be issued. Orders 6 The orders of the Court by consent are: 1. The appeal in respect of the property known as 40 Croydon Street, Petersham is upheld.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate