NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Vodafone Network Pty Limited v Randwick City Council [2008] NSWLEC 1127
APPLICANT Vodafone Network Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Randwick City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11053 of 2007
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Telecommunication facility, visual amenity, health and safety, public interest
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Randwick Local Environmental Plan 1998
Connell Wagner Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 8 CASES CITED: Telstra Corporation Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2007] NSWLEC 571 Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 133
DATES OF HEARING: 30/01/2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11 April 2008
APPLICANT Mr P. Clay, barrister instructed by Mr M. Dean of Corrs Chambers Westgarth LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Ms A. Pearman, barrister instructed by Mr C. McFadzean of Shaw Reynolds Bown & Gerathy
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
11 April 2008
11053 of 2007 Vodafone Network Pty Limited v Randwick City Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 Vodafone has appealed against council's refusal of a development application for the construction and operation of a telecommunications facility, incorporating a 19.4m monopole at the south-western corner of Wassell Street and Franklin Street, Matraville.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate