NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Steger v Ku-ring-gai Council [2008] NSWLEC 1219
APPLICANT Alois Steger PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11284 of 2007
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Deemed Refusal - Section 96 Modification :- streetscape, visual and acoustic privacy, boundary wall,
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordnance
DATES OF HEARING: 27/03/2008 03/06/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 3 June 2008
APPLICANT Ms J. Reid, solicitor, Instructed by Mr J. Palmer, solicitor, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: of Pike Pike & Fenwick
RESPONDENT Ms L. Finn, solicitor, of Home Wilkinson Lowry, Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
3 June 2008
11284 of 2007 Alois Steger v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is a Class 1 Appeal No 11284 of 2007 between Steger and Ku-ring-gai Council in regard to works at No. 31 Murdoch Street, Turramurra, a detached residential house, in a suburban street. The Appeal was subject to a s.34 conciliation conference on-site along with two other appeals, those two have been settled between the parties under s.34 (3)(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and deal with matters related to this appeal. The Appeal was in regard to Council's refusal of a s.96 modification No. MOD0022/07 of DA 237/04 for alterations and additions to an existing house.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate