NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Watson v Ku-ring-gai Council [2008] NSWLEC 1190
APPLICANT PARTIES : Ian Watson RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10199 of 2008
CORAM: Hoffman C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Installation of night lighting in existing tennis court, hours of use for night play, noise
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: s.96 relief sought Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council
DATES OF HEARING: 16 May 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 May 2008
APPLICANT Mr S. Kondilios, solicitor; LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Ms N. Hammond-Deakin, solicitor, of Maddocks Lawyers RESPONDENT Mr A. Hudson, solicitor, of Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hoffman C
16 May 2008
10199 of 2008 Ian Watson v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is class one Appeal 10199 of 2008 Ian Watson and Ku-ring-gai Council in regard to an application to erect pole lights for night playing at an existing tennis court at number 82 Bent Street, Lindfield. The hearing was attended by respondent's representatives Mr A. Hudson, solicitor and Mr S. Segall, council planner, and Mr N. Ragmundo, council planner and Mr S. Natildt, council planner. The applicant was represented by Mr S. Kondilios, solicitor, Ms N. Hammon-Deakin, solicitor, Ms S. Gillett, paralegal, Mr A. Minto, town planner, Mr M. Ficker, Premier Lighting and electrical specialist and Mr and Mrs Watson applicants.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate