NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Greater Taree City Council v Murowski Investments Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 258
APPLICANT Greater Taree City Council
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Murowski Investments Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Hockitt Pastoral Company Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40676 of 2010
CORAM: Pepper J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to strike out paragraphs of Class 4 pleadings pursuant to r 14.28 of the UCPR - application upheld in part - leave to amend granted
Civil Procedure Act 2005 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 109E(3)(e) and 109J(1)(c) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 4.1 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 rr 14.1 and 14.28(1)
CASES CITED: Commissioner for Railways v Bielewicz [1963] NSWR 482
DATES OF HEARING: 10 December 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2010
APPLICANT Mr P Clay with Mr R O'Gorman-Hughes SOLICITORS Stacks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENTS Mr J Ayling SC with Ms H Irish SOLICITORS Low Doherty & Stratford
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
PEPPER J
10 December 2010
40676 of 2010 Greater Taree City Council v Murowski Investments Pty Limited & Hockitt Pastoral Company Pty Limited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate