NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Dean v Minister for Planning and Andros Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 830
APPLICANT Annika Dean
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Minister for Planning
SECOND RESPONDENT Andros Australia Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40889 of 2007
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- judicial review proceedings - usual order that costs follow the event - whether circumstances warrant departure from usual order
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Pt 3A, s 75J, s 123 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Legal Aid Commission Act 1979 s 42
Arnold (on behalf of Australians for Animals) v Queensland (1987) 73 ALR; Dean v Minister for Planning and Andros Australia Pty Limited [2007] NSWLEC 779 (28 November 2007); Drake-Brockman v The Minister for Planning (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 777 (19 November 2007); CASES CITED: Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v Sutherland Shire Council (No 2) (2004) 136 LGERA 365; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Plumb v Penrith City Council (2003) 126 LGERA 109; R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 13
DATES OF HEARING: 18 December 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 18 December 2007
APPLICANT Ms K Ruddock SOLICITORS Environmental Defenders' Office
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate