NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Eurobodalla Shire Council v Christenssen [2008] NSWLEC 134
APPELLANT Eurobodalla Shire Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Mark Christenssen
FILE NUMBER(S) : 60018 of 2007
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- prosecutor's appeal on ground of manifestly inadequate sentence - principles relating to Crown appeals against sentence applicable - penalty low but not manifestly inadequate - no error disclosed - appeal dismissed
Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Axer Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 113 LGERA 356 Camden Council v Runko (2006) 147 LGERA 214 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Cornwall (2007) NSWCCA 359 Eurobodalla Shire Council v Wheelhouse [2006] NSWLEC 98 CASES CITED: Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 Hornsby Shire Council v Devaney [2007] NSWLEC 199 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 R v Tait (1979) 24 ALR 473 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584
DATES OF HEARING: 8 April 2008
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate