NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Filipowski v Hemina Holdings S. A. ; Filipowski v Rajagopalan [2009] NSWLEC 67
LEC No. 50059 of 2008
PROSECUTOR: Barbara Filipowski
DEFENDANT: Hemina Holdings S. A. PARTIES : LEC No. 50060 of 2008
PROSECUTOR: Barbara Filipowski
DEFENDANT: Swaminathan Rajagopalan
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50059 of 2008 and 50060 of 2008
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to adduce evidence by video link - extensive documentary cross-examination - costs of attending - application refused
LEGISLATION CITED: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 31.3
CASES CITED: Australian Medical Imaging Pty Limited v Marconi Medical Systems Australia Pty Limited (2001) 53 NSWLR 1 R v Wilkie (2005) 193 FLR 291; [2005] NSWSC 794
DATES OF HEARING: 22 April 2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 April 2009
PROSECUTOR: R A Dick (barrister) SOLICITORS: Dibbs Barker Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
DEFENDANTS: E G H Cox (barrister) SOLICITORS: HWL Ebsworth Lawyers
JUDGMENT: - 4 - IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Lloyd J
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate