NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Champion Homes Sales Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 621
APPLICANT Champion Homes Sales Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10563 of 2007
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Consent Orders for a two storey attached dual occupancy dual development
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 19/09/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 September 2007
APPLICANT Mr G. Vardas, litigant in person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J. Amy, solicitor of Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
19 September 2007
10563 of 2007 Champion Homes Sales Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 This appeal relates to Development Application No. 070073 which is for the demolition of an existing dwelling and the construction of a new two storey attached dual occupancy dual development at 13 Myrtle Street, Loftus.
2 The site comprises Lot 4 DP 27183 and is regular in shape with a width of 15.24 metres and a depth of 50.336 metres and a site area of 765.1 square metres.
3 The site is included in the zone No. 3 Environmental Housing (Bushland) under Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2006 ("the LEP"). In this zone dual occupancy development is included in category 3 being development allowed only with consent. It was originally thought that this development comprises a town house development which is prohibited and the application was simply refused on this basis. It is now submitted and I accept the submission that the categorisation of the development as dual occupancy within category 3 of the zone is the correct interpretation and as a consequence I have no concern that the development is other than permissible with development consent. 4 The report prepared by a council town planner Ms D. Pinfold considers in detail the applicable development standards contained in the LEP together with the various requirements of the Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2006 ("the DCP") and concludes that the proposed development achieves compliance with all of these requirements. I have also considered these requirements and the manner in which the proposed development responds to these and I accept her analysis.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate