NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Roseville Bridge Marina Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council [2007] NSWLEC 380
APPLICANT Roseville Bridge Marina Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11160 of 2006
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- alterations and additions to an existing Marina, cafe, on-street parking, traffic, noise, pedestrian access
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance
DATES OF HEARING: 1/06/2007 and 14/06/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 14 June 2007
APPLICANT Ms A. Spizzo, solicitor of Herbert Geer Rundle LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr A. Hudson, solicitor of Wilshire Webb Staunton and Beattie
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
14 June 2007
11160 of 2006 Roseville Bridge Marina Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council This decision was given extemporaneously. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
JUDGMENT 1 This appeal relates to the amended Development Application No. 807/06, which is for alterations and additions to the existing 66 berth marina known as the Roseville Bridge Marina at 15 Normac Street, Roseville.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate