NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Keith Harold McNamara v. Parry Shire Council [1989] NSWLEC 218 APPLICANT Keith Harold McNamara
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Parry Shire Council
SECOND RESPONDENT C.J. and D.E. Refalo FILE NUMBER(S) : 10526 of 1987 CORAM: Hemmings J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Clean Waters Act CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 06/04/88, 07/04/88, 08/04/88, 11/04/88, 12/04/88, 13/04/88, 14/04/88, 15/04/88, 18/04/88, 19/04/88 03/04/89, 04/04/89, 05/04/89, 06/04/89, 07/04/89 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/14/1989
APPLICANT P.R. Grogan Phillip Mendes & Co FIRST RESPONDENT W.R. Davison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Everingham Solomons
SECOND RESPONDENT M.G. O'Brien & A.R Blondel Egan Maclean & Co
JUDGMENT:
HIS HONOUR: The second respondent was the owner of Lot101, D.P.243163, Parish of Tangaratta, Shire of Parry, which has been subdivided into Lots1 and 2, D.P.609864. On 3rd September, 1987 the first respondent as consent authority under Local Environmental Plan No.1987 Shire of Parry granted development consent to an application for an expansion of an existing piggery, i.e. |CF2.|PSI"for an intensive piggery for three hundred and fifty sows and progeny"|CF1.|PSO on the said Lot101. The said consent is in respect of designated development and the applicant as an objector has appealed to this Court pursuant to s.98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 (the"E.P.&A.Act").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate