NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Meridian Freight v Botany Bay City Council [2007] NSWLEC 318
APPLICANT Meridian Freight PARTIES : RESPONDENT Botany Bay City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10030 of 2007
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Development Control Plan :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan 33
Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; CASES CITED: Stockland Development Pty Limited v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472; Goldin and Anor v The Minister for Transport; Administering the Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 (2002) 121 LGERA 101
DATES OF HEARING: 22 May 2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 22 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr V Conomos, solicitor Pike Pike & Fenwick LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr T Hale SC INSTRUCTED BY Houston Dearns O'Connor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Moore C
22 May 2007
07/10030 Meridian Freight v Botany Bay City Council
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal of an application pursuant to s 82A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 concerning Development Application 06/188. The application sought consent for the construction of a two storey industrial building in Bay Street, Botany (the site).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate