NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Motorplex (Australia) Pty Limited v Port Stephens Council [2007] NSWLEC 74 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Motorplex (Australia) Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Port Stephens Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11328 of 2004
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Species Impact Statement - whether required - whether endangered ecological communitites on development site - preliminary question
LEGISLATION CITED: Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) s 4
CASES CITED: CBD Prestige Holdings Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie City Council [2005] NSWLEC 367; VAW (Kurri Kurri) Pty Ltd v Scientific Committee (2003) 58 NSWLR 631
DATES OF HEARING: 08/11/2006, 09/11/2006, 21/11/2006, 01/12/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16 February 2007
APPLICANT Mr J Robson SC with Ms A Pearman SOLICITORS Norman Waterhouse LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Larkin (barrister) SOLICITORS Sparke Helmore
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
PRESTON CJ
16 FEBRUARY 2007
11328 OF 2004
MOTORPLEX (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED V PORT STEPHENS COUNCIL
JUDGMENT
1 HIS HONOUR : Motorplex (Australia) Pty Limited operates car racing activities on land at Balickera, 14 kilometres north of Raymond Terrace. The land is described as Lots 1 and 2 in DP 245116 and Lot 3 in DP 787250 and is known as 42-53 Pacific Highway and 105 Italia Road, Balickera. 2 Motorplex wishes to expand its operations to construct a motorsport drag strip, racecourse and spectator facilities. Motorplex lodged a development application with Port Stephens Council. The Council refused the development application. Motorplex appealed to this Court. 3 The Council filed a statement of issues. One of the issues is whether any endangered ecological community listed under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) ("the Act") occurs on the land. If one or more endangered ecological communities occur on the land, a species impact statement in relation to such communities needs to be prepared and to accompany the development application. Development consent cannot be granted if a species impact statement is required but has not accompanied the development application. 4 Accordingly, the parties sought, and the Court directed, that preliminary questions in relation to this issue be heard and determined before the balance of the appeal. The preliminary questions are:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate