NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hart v Ku-ring-gai Council [2007] NSWLEC 352
APPLICANT Robert Hart PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10110 of 2007
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Section 96 Application :- dual occupancy/carport, streetscape and heritage
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2000 Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 38
DATES OF HEARING: 04/05/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr R. Hart, litigant in person
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms C. Bracks, solicitor of Home Wilkinson, Lowry Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
4 May 2007
10110 of 2007 Robert Hart v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an extempore judgment for a matter heard on site this morning against Ku-ring-gai Council's refusal of a s 96 application to modify the approval for a dual occupancy development. The premises the subject of this modification application is the property known as No. 23 Highfield Road, Lindfield.
2 By way of background the council granted approval for a dual occupancy development, subject to certain amendments that were subsequently incorporated into amended plans the subject of the formal approval for the dual occupancy development. One of the conditions was that the carport for house No 1, the subject dwelling be setback further from the street and a change to a flat roof (2 degree).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate