NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 176 LGERA 119
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : The Village McEvoy Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 17
APPLICANT The Village McEvoy Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11264 of 2008
CORAM: Pepper J
KEY ISSUES: JUDICIAL REVIEW :- s 56A appeal from decision of commissioner refusing development consent for proposed retail shopping precinct - principles applicable to a s 56A appeal - whether s 79C(1)(a)(ii) overrules s 79C(1)(e) on the basis that the former is a specific provision whereas the latter is a general provision - whether commissioner took into account irrelevant considerations, including the alleged adverse economic impact of proposed development - whether commissioner failed to take into account relevant considerations, including any negative impact of the proposed development on competition - "public interest" - whether consideration of policy documents and background papers and studies was in error - whether taking into account the objects of the Environment Planning and Assesment Act was in error - whether the commissioner gave "proper, genuine and realistic consideration" to the terms of the LEP - whether the commissioner assessed the proposal against the wrong planning objectives - whether the commissioner substituted his own planning standards for those of the LEP - whether the commissioner misdirected himself as to the evidence - whether there was a failure to give adequate reasons - appeal dismissed.
Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 ss 5, 74C(5), 79C(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A South Sydney Local Environmental Plan 1998 South Sydney Development Control Plan 1997
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate