NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Qu v Blacktown City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1282
APPLICANT Gang Qu PARTIES : RESPONDENT Blacktown City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10521 of 2010
CORAM: Fakes C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- deemed refusal of a brothel on the basis of proximity to sensitive land uses and the public interest; time-limited condition imposed; land uses not found to be sensitive; no finding of fact in the public interest; time-limited consent unreasonable in the circumstances; appeal upheld
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Blacktown Local Environmental Plan 1988
Weynton v Rockdale City Council [1999] NSWLEC 273 Marpet Enterprises v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 159 Wang v Blacktown City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1044 Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614 Huang v Parramatta City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1401 CASES CITED: Wei v Parramatta City Council No 2 [2010] NSWLEC 1107 FRG Investments Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1228 Piao v Willoughby Council [2008] NSWLEC 1407 Wendy Wei v Holroyd City Council [2007] NSWLEC 163 New Century Developments Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 154 Venus Enterprises P/L v Parramatta City Council LGRA 43
DATES OF HEARING: 22/09/2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20 October 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate