NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Admark Constructions Pty Ltd v Camden Council [2010] NSWLEC 1005
APPLICANT Admark Constructions Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Camden Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10575 of 2006 and 10576 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Strata subdivision of multi housing units, live/work unit, studio apartment, parking and private open space amenity
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Camden Local Environmental Plan 47
Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472 CASES CITED: Carstens v Pittwater Council [1999] NSWLEC 249 Goldin & Anor v Minister for Transport Administering the Ports Corporatisation and Waterways Management Act 1995 [2002]] NSWLEC 75
DATES OF HEARING: 14 December 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12 January 2010
APPLICANT Mr M Mantei (solicitor) SOLICITOR Planning Law Solutions Pty Ltd
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S Griffiths (solicitor) SOLICITOR Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
12 January 2010
10575 of 2009 Admark Constructions Pty Ltd v Camden 10576 of 2009 Council
JUDGMENT Background. 1 These proceedings involve 2 separate appeals against council's refusal of development applications in respect of Nos 232 & 234 Mount Annan Drive, Mount Annan. The parties agreed to the appeals being heard concurrently and they involve: Appeal No 10575/2009; An appeal against the refusal of a strata subdivision of a recently created live/work dwelling into 2 lots comprising a 2 – bedroom unit on the upper level a commercial unit on the ground floor. Also, the conversion of part of the landscaped open space area into a car space at 234 Mt Annan Drive. Appeal No 10576/2009; An appeal against the refusal of a strata subdivision of a dwelling and studio into 2 residential lots and the conversion of part of the landscaped open space area into a car space at 232 Mt Annan Drive. 2 Both of these properties have been recently developed as part of the Mt Annan master plan. They are located in relatively close proximity to a small neighbourhood centre and were apparently created to provide for a variety of lifestyles in terms of dwelling types and working opportunities. 3 The issues identified for the appeal are summarised as: Permissibilty of the developments. The proposal is not in accordance the Tallowood Place Masterplan. Multi – unit housing is not permitted on the site. Parking impacts and adequacy of private open space. Public interest. Precedent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate