NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Relaxing Centre Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 487
APPLICANT Relaxing Centre Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10009 of 2007
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Brothel, number of working rooms, number of employees, carparking, signage
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 14/06/2007
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 14 June 2007
APPLICANT Mr T. Tzouaras, solicitor of Tzouras Legal LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr J. Reilly, solicitor of Hone Wilkinson Lowry Lawyers incorporating the practice of Abbott Tout Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
14 June 2007
10009 of 2007 Relaxing Centre Pty Limited v Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against Sutherland Shire Council's refusal of a development application for a brothel. The premises are upstairs in an industrial unit building known as 64 Alexander Avenue, Taren Point.
2 The proposed development application is for three working rooms with a manager and two sex workers to be employed on the premises. The application before the Court in exhibit A shows a parking configuration for the whole of the site that is all the uses within the building. The subject development application is for an upstairs small portion of the total premises.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate