NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Drummond & Rosen Pty Limited v Leichhardt Council [2007] NSWLEC 375
APPLICANT Drummond & Rosen Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11249 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- mixed commercial development, suitability of location, compliance with SEPP 66, traffic, public interest.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000 State Environmental and Regional Planning Policy No 11 - Traffic Generating Development; State Environmental Planning Policy No - Remediation of Land; State Environmental Planning Policy No 64 - Advertising Signage; LEGISLATION CITED: Draft State Environmental Planning Policy No 66 - Integrating Land Use and Transport Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005. Leichhardt Development Control Plan 2000. (DCP). Development Control Plan No 32 (Design for Activity of Access), Development Control Plan No 36 (Notifications), Development Control Plan No 38 (Waste Minimisation, Removal and Storage), Development Control Plan No 42 (Contaminated Land Management)
BGP Properties Pty Ltd v Lake Macquarie City Council [2004] NSWLEC 399 ; CASES CITED: Terrace Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2003] 129 LGERA 195; Bonim Stanmore Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2006] NSWLEC 771; Stadurn Pty Limited v Blacktown City Council [2004] NSWLEC 348
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate