NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Xuereb v Ott [2007] NSWLEC 474
APPLICANT Joe and Dale Xuereb PARTIES : RESPONDENT Joachim Ott
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20367 of 2007
CORAM: Brown C - Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: Trees (Neighbours) :- removal of tree - damage - compensation
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 23/07/07
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 23 July 2007
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C with Thyer AC
23 July 2007
20367 of 2007 Joe and Dale Xuereb v Joachim Ott
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is an application made pursuant to s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 by Joe and Dale Xuereb of 2 Leighton Street, Rooty Hill concerning three trees located close to the common rear boundary of Mr Joachim Ott of 1 Waratah Street, Rooty Hill.
2 The extemporaneous decision was given on site on 23 July 2007 and the judgment reflects the findings and the background documentation provided as part of the proceedings.
3 Mr and Mrs Xuereb's application is to require the removal of the three trees as: o branches fall from the trees and have damaged a previous shed, a new shed and aviary located towards the rear of their property (and adjoining the Ott property), o branches fall from the trees and have landed on the clothes line. o the falling branches pose a serious safety risk for people in the rear yard of their property, o the shade from the trees prevents grass growing in the rear yard, 4 Compensation of $330 for roof repairs to the new shed and $66 for a surveyors report is sought.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate