NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Wollongong City Council v Ensile Pty Limited; Wollongong City Council v Hogarth (No 3) [2008] NSWLEC 148
PROSECUTOR Wollongong City Council PARTIES : DEFENDANTS Ensile Pty Limited & Robert Martin (aka Bob) Hogarth
FILE NUMBER(S) : 50019 of 2007; 50021 of 2007; 50047 of 2007; 50048 of 2007
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- claim for privilege - whether prosecutor's claim can be maintained against defendants - s123 Evidence Act - adducing evidence - call for production - privilege lost by reason of s123
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995
DATES OF HEARING: 16 April 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16 April 2008
PROSECUTOR Mr C W McEwen SC with Mr Matthew Fraser and Mr Michael Staunton SOLICITORS Kells the Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANTS Mr T F Robertson SC with Mr T G Howard SOLICITORS Burrell Solicitors
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Jagot J
16 April 2008
50019 of 2007 50047 of 2007
WOLLONGONG CITY COUNCIL Prosecutor
ENSILE PTY LIMITED Defendant
50021 of 2007 50048 of 2007
WOLLONGONG CITY COUNCIL Prosecutor
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate