NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : CSA Architects Pty Limited v Waverley Council [2008] NSWLEC 1166
APPLICANT CSA Architects Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT Waverley Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10088 of 2008
CORAM: Watts AC
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- Streetscape, Views, Reasonableness given the non-compliance with FSR and setbacks.
LEGISLATION CITED: Waverley Local Environmental Plan 1996, (WLEP) Waverley Development Control Plan 2006, (DCP2006)
CASES CITED: Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 140
DATES OF HEARING: 18/04/2008
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 April 2008
APPLICANT: Ms S M Hill, solicitor SOLICITORS: Susan Hill & Associates, Lawyers Pty Limited LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT: Mr S H Patterson, solicitor SOLICITORS: Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Watts AC
30 April 2008
10088 of 2008 – CSA Architects Pty Limited v Waverley Council
JUDGMENT
1 This involves an appeal under s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against the deemed refusal by Waverley Council (the council) of a modification of development consent No L – 359 – 2001 to erect a town house development at Lot 15, DP 59124 and Lot 3, DP303643, being Nos 18 – 22 Diamond Bay Road, Vaucluse.
2 I visited the land in company with the parties on the morning of the on-site hearing. Local residents gave evidence.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate