NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : De Stoop v Ku-ring-gai Council [2010] NSWLEC 1019 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Lindy De Stoop PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10352 of 2008
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Seniors Living Development; impact on heritage item; height and bulk; impact on adjoining properties; overshadowing and privacy; character of areas; SEPP1; objections; impact on residential amenity of adjoining properties.
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy 1 Seniors Living SEPP No. 65
Hooker Corporation Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council, unreported, LEC No 10506 of 1982, 27 July 1983 CASES CITED: Winten Property Group Limited v North Sydney Council [2001] NSWLEC 46 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827 Pafburn v North Sydney Council [2005] NSWLEC 444
DATES OF HEARING: 11, 12, 14 August 2009, 29 September 2009, 8 and 12 October 2009.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27 April 2010
APPLICANT Mr G Green (solicitor) SOLICITOR Pikes Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr A Pickles (barrister) SOLICITOR HWL Ebsworth
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate