NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fowler & Anor v Canterbury City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1089 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Bruce Fowler & Wang Guo PARTIES : RESPONDENT Canterbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10875 of 2009
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- Continuing use as a brothel, adverse neighbour amenity, anti-social behaviour, internal amenity and parking.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 148
CASES CITED: Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2005] NSWCA 15
DATES OF HEARING: 29 March 2010
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22 April 2010
APPLICANT Dr S Berveling (barrister) SOLICITOR G Russo (solicitor) Russo & Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P Jackson (solicitor) SOLICITOR Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
22 April 2010
10875 of 2009 Bruce Fowler & Wang Guo v Canterbury City Council
JUDGMENT
Background 1 This is an appeal against council's refusal of a development application for the continued use of the property at 269 Canterbury Road, Canterbury for a brothel in conjunction with an existing approved use for Chinese Acupuncture and Therapeutic Massage.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate