NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Pideski v Wagga City Council & anor [2010] NSWLEC 1006
APPLICANTS J & B Pideski
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Wagga City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Director-General Department of Planning
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10634 of 2009
CORAM: Moore SC
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Wagga Wagga Rural Local Environmental Plan 1991
CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167; (2001) 115 LGERA 373
DATES OF HEARING: 15 December 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13 January 2010
APPLICANTS Mr P McEwen SC INSTRUCTED BY Williams Love & Nicol
FIRST RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr S Simington Lindsay Taylor Lawyers
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr P Clay, barrister INSTRUCTED BY Department of Planning
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC
13 January 2010
10634 of 2009 Pideski v Wagga City Council & anor
JUDGMENT 1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: Brucedale is a locality on the northern side of the city of Wagga Wagga located approximately 15 km from the city's centre along the Olympic Highway (the highway). Brucedale Road runs from this highway, in a generally westerly direction, to a rural residential subdivision located on the upper slopes of a hill some half a kilometre or so from the highway. Although this rural residential subdivision was inspected during the course of the site view, nothing concerning its circumstances warrants recital given the conclusions discussed below.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate