NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hung v Bird [2008] NSWLEC 1246
APPLICANT Janet Hung PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Maurice & Helen Bird
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20452 of 2008
CORAM: Moore C
Jurisdiction - Trees (Neighbours) :- KEY ISSUES: No genuine dispute between the parties No jurisdiction under the Trees Act
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152
DATES OF HEARING: 20 June 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 20 June 2008
APPLICANT In person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPOPNDENTS In person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
2 June 2008
08/20452 Janet Hung v Maurice & Helen Bird
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication. 1 COMMISSIONER : In Mrs Hung's application, which is that the Court order Mr and Mrs Bird to remove a tree, she makes mention of the fact that Mr and Mrs Bird applied in late 2007 for permission from Baulkham Hills Council to remove the tree which is the subject of Mrs Hung's application. The Birds' application, made for permission pursuant to the council's tree preservation order, was refused.
2 At the commencement of the preliminary hearing, I asked Mr and Mrs Bird whether they had, at the time of their 2007 application, genuinely wanted to remove the tree and whether they still wished to do so. They indicated that they had wished to remove the tree and still did wish to remove the tree.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate