NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : James Godfrey v Wollondilly Shire Council (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 280
APPLICANT James Godfrey PARTIES : RESPONDENT Wollondilly Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10865 of 2006
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- resolution of outstanding issues - development consent granted - costs - whether fair and reasonable for applicant to pay part of Council's costs - development application insufficiently clear and not accompanied by adequate information - applicant ordered to pay part of Council's costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69 Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 16 r 4
DATES OF HEARING: 16/5/07
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24 May 2007
APPLICANT Mr P Clay SOLICITORS Moloney Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr M Wright SOLICITORS Marsdens Law Group
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Jagot J
24 May 2007
10865 of 2006
JAMES GODFREY Applicant
WOLLONDILLY SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT Jagot J:
1 I delivered principal reasons in respect of this appeal on 30 January 2007. As contemplated by my reasons, the applicant submitted a further report of Mr Morse with respect to dust suppression specifying a maintenance regime for all stockpiles and a further report of Mr Haskew with respect to internal traffic arrangements. The applicant also submitted a draft operational management plan and final site development plan. The parties, with the benefit of those documents, submitted agreed conditions of development consent.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate