NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 134 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
10004 of 2009 APPLICANT: Addenbrooke Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT: Woollahra Municipal Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Sydney Harbour Foreshores Committee
PARTIES : 10005 of 2009 APPLICANT: Addenbrooke Pty Ltd
FIRST RESPONDENT: Woollahra Municipal Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Sydney Harbour Foreshores Committee
THIRD RESPONDENT: Ktut Arya & Ors
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10004 of 2009; 10005 of 2009
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- appeal - development of adjacent marinas at Rose Bay and Point Piper on Sydney Harbour - planning considerations - visual impact - conditional consent granted for Rose Bay Marina proposal except for eastern arm and certain berths - conditional consent granted for Point Piper Marina proposal as changed at the hearing - conditions include maximum height for berthed boats
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C, 80, 80A(1), 83A - 83D Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cll 94, 95 LEGISLATION CITED: Interpretation Act 1987, s 35(2)(a) Sydney Harbour Foreshores & Waterways Area Development Control Plan for SREP (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005, cll 3, 4, Appendix D Sydney Regional Environmental Plan (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005, cll 2, 17, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 59, Pt 3 Div 2
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate