NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 167 LGERA 91
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 92 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT: Mosman Municipal Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT: David Kelly
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40967 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: CONTEMPT :- disobedience of an order to demolish a garage within a specified time - whether a proceeding for criminal or civil contempt - whether statement of charge deficient because did not allege that disobedience was contumacious - whether order had to be served - whether order void because no power to make it - whether order impossible of performance within the time specified
Civil Procedure Act 2005, ss 3, 103, 130, 131, 133(1), 138(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 76A Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 5 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 2007, r 4.5 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 101(6) Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 42 (repealed), Pt 55 rr 6, 7, 8, 9, 13 Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 1996 (Vic), r 66.10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, rr 36.4(1), 36.5, 36.16, 40.6, 40.7, Pt 36, Pt 40
Ainsworth v Hanrahan (1991) 25 NSWLR 155 Arnold v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000 (No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 56 Attorney-General (NSW) v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 1 NSWLR 362 Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1992] 1 AC 191 Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 Australian Consolidated Press v Morgan [1965] HCA 21, (1965) 112 CLR 483 Bailey v Marinoff [1971] HCA 49, (1971) 125 CLR 529 Boddington v British Transport Police [1999] 2 AC 143 Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Chiltern District Council v Keane [1985] 1 WLR 619 Coward v Stapleton [1953] HCA 48, (1953) 90 CLR 573 DJL v The Central Authority [2000] HCA 17, (2000) 201 CLR 226 Fairclough & Sons v Manchester Ship Canal Co (1897) 41 Sol Jo 225 Greater Hume Shire Council v J & L Cauchi Civil Contracting Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 738 Harmsworth v Harmsworth [1987] 1 WLR 1676 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36, (2008) 235 CLR 125 Home Office v Harman [1983] 1 AC 280 CASES CITED: Hurstville City Council v Jacobs [2007] NSWLEC 630 Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Timania Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 155, (2005) 221 ALR 823 Lade & Co. Pty Ltd v Black [2006] 2 Qd R 531 Markisic v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] NSWCA 92, (2007) 69 NSWLR 737 Matthews v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] FCA 288, (2007) 97 FCR 396 McDonnell v Novello [2006] NSWSC 1186 Miller v Eurovox Pty Ltd [2004] VSCA 211 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly [2007] NSWLEC 90 Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 229 Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd v The J Aron Corporation and the Goldman Sachs Group Inc [2007] NSWCA 195, (2007) 70 NSWLR 411 Owners Strata Plan 37762 v Pham [2007] NSWLEC 252, (2007) 154 LGERA 150 Pelechowski v The Registrar, Court of Appeal (NSW) [1999] HCA 19, (1999) 198 CLR 435 Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Maniam [No 2] (1992) 26 NSWLR 309 Re M; M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377 Re Tuck [1906] 1 Ch 692 Savings & Investment Bank Ltd v Gasco Investments (Netherlands) BV (No 2) [1988] 1 Ch 422 Street v Hearne [2007] NSWCA 113, (2007) 70 NSWLR 231 Tweed Shire Council v Mannix (1983) 50 LGRA 369 Witham v Holloway [1995] HCA 3, (1995) 183 CLR 525
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate