NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : McKees Legal Solutions v Leichhardt Council [2009] NSWLEC 1346
APPLICANT McKees Legal Solutions PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10385 of 2009
CORAM: Brown C - Sullivan AC
KEY ISSUES: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION :- subdivision of an existing lot into 2 Torrens Title lots - concept dwelling design - impact on heritage items
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000
CASES CITED: Anglican Church Property Trust v Sydney City Council [2003] NSWLEC 353 Parrott v Kiama [2004] NSWLEC 77
DATES OF HEARING: 15, 16 September 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20 October 2009
APPLICANT Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS McKees Legal Solutions LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms R McCulloch, solicitor SOLICITORS Pikes Lawyers
JUDGMENT: - 7 - THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Brown C with Sullivan AC
20 October 2009
10385 of 2009 McKees Legal Solutions v Leichhardt Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: This is an appeal against the refusal by Leichhardt Council (the council) of Development Application D/2009/46 for the subdivision of an existing lot into 2 Torrens Title lots at 24 Pearson Street, Balmain East (the site). 2 The contentions raised by the council relate to whether the proposed subdivision will provide the opportunity for a dwelling that complies with the council's planning controls and in the event a dwelling could be constructed on a new lot created by the subdivision, whether the dwelling would adversely affect the heritage significance of an adjoining heritage item and other nearby heritage items. The site and surrounding area 3 The site is Lot 100 in DP 872400 with a street frontage of 17.39 m and side boundaries of approximately 49 m giving a total site area of 819.1 sq m. The northern part of the site has a slight slope towards the south to a sandstone cliff face located around 36 m from the northern boundary. South of the cliff face, the land continues to slope gradually towards and an irregular dry-packed stone retaining wall up to 2 m in height and located about 6 m south of the sandstone cliff face. The retaining wall extends east of a sandstone rock face/outcrop, which is located in the south western portion of the site. South of the retaining wall, the ground surface continues to gradually slope towards another retaining wall located approximately 4 m away, along the southern boundary of the site. This retaining wall is approximately 4 m in height and located adjacent to the southern boundary, shared with properties in William Street. Expansive views are available of Johnstons Bay towards Pyrmont from the site. 4 The northern part of the site, at the Pearson Street frontage, is occupied by a single storey Victorian gothic cottage with attic and is called "Rothesay". It is identified by the council as a heritage item. Rothesay is currently unoccupied and in a poor state of repair. The southern part of the site, contains only retaining walls and no structures. Crossing the site an east-west direction is a rock ledge revealing previous quarrying activity and which forms part of the historic character of the area. Rothsay is situated above this rock ledge and was built after quarrying ceased.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate