NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Merimbula Nominees Pty Limited v Bega Valley Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 529
APPLICANT: Merimbula Nominees Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Bega Valley Shire Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10394 of 2006
CORAM: Lloyd J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- under s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - appeal limited to an error of law - failure to have regard to centrally relevant material - misinterpretation of a retail economic study - inadequacy of reasons - no error of law
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s56A
Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430; Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1985) 79 LGERA 367; Coles v Woollahra Municipal Council (1986) 59 LGRA 133 at 138; Randwick Municipal Council v Crawley (1986) 60 LGRA 271; CASES CITED: Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378; Merimbula Nominees Pty Ltd v Bega Valley Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 107; Misfud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725; Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 271; Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) NSWLR 589; (2001) 115 LGERA 373
DATES OF HEARING: 31/07/2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 7 November 2007
APPLICANT: C W McEwen SC and M A Staunton (barrister) SOLICITORS: Spiegel & Associates
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate