NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Bruggemann v Coull [2008] NSWLEC 1124
APPLICANT Joan Bruggemann PARTIES : RESPONDENT Paul and Roslyn Coull
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20041 of 2008
CORAM: Thyer AC - Watts AC
KEY ISSUES: Neighbour Application - Trees (Neighbours) :- Removal of trees, compensation for damage
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 20/03/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 20 March 2008
APPLICANT Joan Bruggemann, litigant in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Paul and Roslyn Coull, litigants in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Thyer AC with Watts AC
20 March 2008
20041 of 2008
Joan Bruggemann v Paul and Roslyn Coull
JUDGMENT The decision was given at the hearing on 20 March 2008. This written judgment reflects the findings and the background documentation provided as part of the proceedings. 1 ACTING COMMISSIONERS: Mrs Bruggemann says she was the first in her area of Heathcote to have PVC sewer pipes installed. She later had a swimming pool constructed beside that pipe, in the hollow below the rock escarpment, in her backyard. Extensive excavation was required in the solid rock, and the concrete pool was installed within 300 mm of the sewer pipe. Twenty-five years later, the sewer became blocked by a mass of fine tree roots that we were told had entered at a faulty junction in the pipe beside the pool. Mrs Bruggemann has had disagreements for some years, with her neighbours the Coulls about a retaining wall and fence beside the pool. It is now her opinion that the Bottlebrush tree growing on the Coull's property has caused the sewer blockage and she is concerned that the roots of a gum tree on their property may damage her pool if it were to fall.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate