NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd v Manly Council (No 2) [2007] NSWLEC 350
APPLICANT PARTIES : Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd RESPONDENT Manly Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10592 of 2005
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Existing Use Rights :- whether existing use rights abandoned.
Contaminated Land Management Act 1997 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s107, s108 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 13 r 16(h) Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980 (Cth) s17, s17B State Environmental Planning Policy 55
Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2007] NSWLEC 105; Dosan Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council (2001) 117 LGERA 363; Drummoyne Municipal Council v Cavallaro (1982) 46 LGRA 416; CASES CITED: Hudak v Waverley Municipal Council (1990) 18 NSWLR 709; Star Property Investments Pty Ltd and Anor v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 235; Waverley Council v Hairis Architects (2002) 123 LGERA 100; Woollahra Municipal Council v Banool Developments Pty Limited (1973) 129 CLR 138; Woollahra Municipal Council v TAJJ investments Pty Ltd (1982) 49 LGRA 123
27/07/2006, 28/07/2006, 14/08/2006, 15/08/2006, DATES OF HEARING: 04/09/2006, 17/11/2007 (Written submissions), 27/11/2006 (Written submissions), 14/3/07 (Judgment No 1), 3/4/07 (Hearing on whether abandonment of existing use rights should be decided).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate