NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hromek v Hawkesbury City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1130 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Robert Hromek PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hawkesbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10127 of 2010
CORAM: Dixon C
KEY ISSUES: APPEAL :- section 96 and retrospective approval of a shed
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No. 20 (No. 2) Hawkesbury Nepean River Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 1989 LEGISLATION CITED: Draft Hawkesbury Local Environmental Plan 2009 Hawkesbury Development Control Plan 2002 Part A Chapter 2 – General Information Pard D Chapter 8 – Erection of Rural Sheds
Moto Projects (No. 2) Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council (1999) 106 LGRA 298 Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167 Richard v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2008) NSWLEC 1503 CASES CITED: Ireland v Cessnock City Council 110 LGERA 311 Kouflidis and Jenguin Pty Ltd v Corporation of the City of Sailsbury (1982) 29 SAJR 321 Jonah Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2006) NSWLEC 99 Longa v Blacktown City council (1985) 54 LGERA at 308 Windy Drop Down v Warringah Council (2000) LGRA 299
DATES OF HEARING: 18 May 2010, 19 May 2010 and 23 May 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate