NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Whyte v Jourdant & Anor [2009] NSWLEC 1030
APPLICANT Colleen Whyte PARTIES : RESPONDENT Grant Jourdant and Catherine Jourdant
FILE NUMBER(S) : 21058 of 2008
CORAM: Thyer AC
KEY ISSUES: TREES (NEIGHBOURS) :- Flood Gum to be removed and dead wood to be prunded from two Tallow-wood trees.
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
DATES OF HEARING: 03/02/2009
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 3 February 2009
APPLICANT Ms C. Whyte, litigant in person LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr G. Jourdant and Mrs C. Jourdant, litigants in person
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Thyer AC
3 February 2009
21058 of 2008
Colleen Whyte v Grant Jourdant and Catherine Jourdant
JUDGMENT The extemporaneous decision was given on 3 February 2009. This written judgment includes the findings given on-site, relevant observations and background information. 1 ACTING COMMISSIONER: Three eucalyptus trees are growing in the north-eastern corner of the backyard of 74 Taloumbi Road Coffs Harbour, each about 1 m from the common boundary of the adjoining property to the east. Mr and Mrs Jourdant are the owner occupiers of 74 Taloumbi Road. They have owned the property since 1995.
2 Mrs Whyte is the owner occupier of the adjoining property to the east. She bought her property in about 1986 soon after it was built. Her backyard had been excavated into the hillside, and a concrete block wall about 2 m high built to retain the backyard of 74 Taloumbi Road and the railway land, prior to her purchase. The three trees were growing at the time she moved in, the northern two were about three quarters their present size and the southern tree about half its present size.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate