NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Purrazzo v Valuer-General [2009] NSWLEC 1132
APPLICANTS A & N Purrazzo PARTIES : RESPONDENT Valuer-General
FILE NUMBER(S) : 31021 of 2008
CORAM: Moore SC
KEY ISSUES: VALUATION OF LAND :-
LEGISLATION CITED: Valuation of Land Act 1916
DATES OF HEARING: 24 and 27 March 2009
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30 April 2009
APPLICANTS Ms F Berglund, barrister INSTRUCTED BY Lapaine Pomare & Forster LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms A Pearman, barrister INSTRUCTED BY NSW Crown Solicitor
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE SC
30 April 2009
08/31021 A & N Purrazzo v Valuer-General
JUDGMENT 1 SENIOR COMMISSIONER: The intersection of Ramsay and Dalhousie Streets at Haberfield is the hub of the suburb's shopping centre. How the values of various commercial premises in these two streets relate to each other is the matter requiring consideration and evaluation in these proceedings.
2 90A Ramsay Street (the site) comprises a single retail tenancy with a frontage of ~15 m to which is appended, on the eastern side, a driveway some 2 m wide. This driveway is augmented by a strip ~1 m wide attached to the property next to the east. The premises on the site are single-storey and are currently leased to the TAB and operate as retail betting outlet.
3 The site shares the same zoning with the four sales that are in evidence as comparable sales for valuation purposes. All have a floor space ratio entitlement of 1.8:1 under Ashfield Council's Local Environmental Plan.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate